Speaking about sex....

Speaking about sex, is it just me or are there other red-blooded, American, heterosexual males (or bi-females) that would like to see a porn cartoon starring the Esurance cartoon female with the pink hair?

No, I am not perverse. According to my dictionary (The Random House College Dictionary, 1984), perverse means the following:
--Willfully determined not to do what is expected or desired. (First definition.)
--Persistent or obstinate in what is wrong. (Fourth definition; 2 and 3 really weren't applicable here.)
--Turned away from what is right, good, or proper. (Fifth definition.)

Any intelligent, educated and logical person knows that normally healthy heterosexual males like, or are aroused by, graphic sexual depictions. It's hardwired into our brains. So that would be what is to be "expected". . . and what I, and many others, "desire."

Drawing, selling, and looking at a pornographic cartoon violates no one's rights. It cannot be wrong in a truly secular sense, in a truly free and liberty-loving society. Some may find it to be against their religion or morally wrong . . . but I don't go to that church. Therefore, I cannot logically see how my desire is wrong.

That which is "good", "right", or "proper" differs from age-to-age, culture-to-culture, nation-to-nation, religion-to-religion, and even among people within the same age, culture, nation, and religion to some degree. So, exactly what is good, right, and proper? I say it is not violating the rights of others. Treating others as I want to be treated. Everything else is up for grabs. If viewing a porn cartoon such as I suggested gives me pleasure and doesn't harm other people or their property, then, as far as I'm concerned, it is good, right, and proper and no one's business but mine.

There is the school of thought that viewing porn, even cartoon versions of it, will make me want to force myself sexually on minors and unwilling adults. That school of thinking is really illogical and based purely on emotion, generally coming from the dogma of one religion or another. I have been viewing pornography in one form or another (even inside my head . . . it's called fantasizing) for decades and I still don't want to have non-consensual sex with anyone. So, viewing the Esurance gal getting hers wouldn't lead me into violent behavior towards others, nor would it lead me to have sex with a minor. (By definition, sex with a minor is rape, even if she agrees to it.)

Well, this porn cartoon thing was just a thought . . . one I think of nearly every time I see one of the Esurance commercials. No, I'm not perverse. Although I just may have an over-active imagination . . . and too much time on my hands.